Skip to main content

AB Devlet Başkanlarının T.C. Başbakanı ile yaptıkları Görüşmelerinin Sonuçları (8 Mart 2016)

By Haberler

1. Following their meeting with Prime Minister Davutoğlu, the EU Heads of State or Government addressed the migration situation, in particular as regards the Western Balkans route. They welcomed their discussion with the Turkish Prime Minister on EU-Turkey relations and on the progress made in the implementation of the Joint Action Plan. Turkey confirmed its commitment in implementing the bilateral Greek-Turkish readmission agreement to accept the rapid return of all migrants not in need of international protection crossing from Turkey into Greece and to take back all irregular migrants apprehended on Turkish waters.

The Heads of State or Government agreed that bold moves were needed to close down people smuggling routes, to break the business model of the smugglers, to protect our external borders and to end the migration crisis in Europe. We need to break the link between getting in a boat and getting settlement in Europe.

That is why they underlined the importance of the NATO activity in the Aegean Sea that became operational today. They called on all members of NATO to support it actively. They warmly welcomed the additional proposals made today by Turkey to address the migration issue. They agreed to work on the basis of the principles they contain:

  • to return all new irregular migrants crossing from Turkey into the Greek islands with the costs covered by the EU;
  • to resettle, for every Syrian readmitted by Turkey from Greek islands, another Syrian from Turkey to the EU Member States, within the framework of the existing commitments;
  • to accelerate the implementation of the visa liberalization roadmap with all Member States with a view to lifting the visa requirements for Turkish citizens at the latest by the end of June 2016;
  • to speed up the disbursement of the initially allocated 3 billion euros to ensure funding of a first set of projects before the end of March and decide on additional funding for the Refugee Facility for Syrians;
  • to prepare for the decision on the opening of new chapters in the accession negotiations as soon as possible, building on the October 2015 European Council conclusions;
  • to work with Turkey in any joint endeavour to improve humanitarian conditions inside Syria which would allow for the local population and refugees to live in areas which will be more safe.

The President of the European Council will take forward these proposals and work out the details with the Turkish side before the March European Council. This work will respect European and international law.

The EU Heads of State or Government also discussed with the Turkish Prime Minister the situation of the media in Turkey.

2. Heads of State or Government further recalled that the European Council, at its meeting on 18-19 February, decided to get back to a situation where all Members of the Schengen area fully apply the Schengen Borders Code, while taking into account the specificities of the maritime borders, and to end the wave-through approach. Irregular flows of migrants along the Western Balkans route have now come to an end.

3. In order to make this sustainable, action is required along the following lines:

a) stand by Greece, in this difficult moment and do our utmost to help manage the situation that has arisen as a consequence of this development. This is a collective EU responsibility requiring fast and efficient mobilisation of all available EU means and resources and of Member States’ contributions;

b) provide an immediate and effective response to the very difficult humanitarian situation which is rapidly developing on the ground. Emergency support will be provided urgently by the Commission, in close cooperation with Greece, other Member States and non-governmental organisations on the basis of an assessment, by the Commission and Greece, of the needs and a contingency and response plan. In this context, Heads of State or Government welcome the Commission proposal on the provision of emergency support within the EU  and call on the Council to adopt it before the March European Council, thus expanding the range of financial instruments that can be used; they invite the budgetary authority to take any necessary follow-up measures;

c) provide further assistance to Greece in managing the external borders, including those with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Albania, and ensuring the proper functioning of hotspots, with 100% identification, registration and security checks, and the provision of sufficient reception capacities. Frontex will launch an additional call for national guest officers as soon as possible and all Member States should respond in full by 1 April at the latest. Europol will rapidly deploy guest officers in all hotspots to reinforce security checks and support the Greek authorities in the fight against smugglers;

d) assist Greece in ensuring comprehensive, large scale and fast-track returns to Turkey of all irregular migrants not in need of international protection, building on the Greece-Turkey readmission agreement and, from 1 June, the EU-Turkey readmission agreement;

e) accelerate substantially the implementation of relocation to alleviate the heavy burden that presently weighs on Greece. EASO will launch a further call for national expertise to support the Greek asylum system and all Member States should respond rapidly and in full. Member States are also invited to provide more places for relocation as a matter of urgency. The Commission will report on a monthly basis  to the Council on the implementation of relocation commitments;

f) continue to cooperate closely with the non-EU countries of the Western Balkans and provide any necessary assistance;

g) implement the existing resettlement commitments and continue work on a credible voluntary humanitarian admission programme with Turkey;

h) take any necessary measures immediately in respect of any new routes opening up, and step up the fight against smugglers;

i) take forward, as a matter of priority, all the elements of the Commission roadmap on getting “back to Schengen”, so as to end temporary internal border controls and re-establish the normal functioning of the Schengen area before the end of the year.

This document does not establish any new commitments on Member States as far as relocation and resettlement is concerned.

Cameron İngiltere’nin AB içinde kalması tezini savunuyor. Referandum 23 Haziran’da

By Haberler

Bu cumartesi sabahı İngiltere Başbakanı Cameron kabinesini 10 Downing Street’te toplayarak Brüksel’de AB konseyi üyeleriyle yaptığı görüşmelerin olumlu geçtiğini, ve refromları uygulayan bir AB içinde kalmanın uygun olacağını anlattı. Kabine  referandum’un 23 Haziran’da yapılmasına karar verdi. Ayrıca kabine üyelerinin seçim gününe kadar yapılacak propaganda çalışmalarında AB de kalma veya çıkma konusunda serbest kalabilecekleri ifade edildi. Kabine üyelerinden Michael Gove (Adalet Bakanı), Theresa Villiers (Kuzey Irlanda İşlerine bakan), Ian Duncan Smith (Çalışma ve Emeklilik Fonları Bakanı), John Wittingdale (Kültür Bakanı) ve Chris Grayling’in ( Avam kamarası başkanı) AB’ ye hayır tezini destekleyeceklerini söylediler. 

Türkiye Bir Avrupa ve Bölge Merkezi Midir?Avrupa Akdeniz İlişkileri İçin Çıkarımlar

By AB Karar Alma Sürecine Bağlanma

                XIIth CONFERENCE of the MEDITERRANNEAN COMMISSION

                           Turkey as a European and regional hub

                        Implications for Euro-Mediterranean relations

Istanbul, 5-6 February 2016

                                      Summary of the meeting

« Is Turkey a European and regional hub?” this was the topic of an international conference that was organised in Istanbul on February 5th and 6th 2016. The meeting analysed Turkey’s strategic position as a bridge between Europe and other neighbouring regions and its implications for Euro-Mediterranean relations in four different sectors: energy, finances, infrastructures and production. The conference concluded that Turkey already is an enviable transit hub, but that the bar should be put higher to make it into a real trading hub. The speed of the EU accession process will of course play a determining role.

The international meeting was attended by some 80 participants from the EU and Turkey. The conference was co-organised by IKV (Economic Development Foundation, Istanbul), CIDOB (Barcelona Centre for International Affairs) and the Mediterranean Commission of ELEC (European League for Economic Cooperation, Brussels).

In his welcome remarks Carles Gasòliba, president of CIDOB and of the Mediterranean Commission of ELEC, pointed out that the previous meetings of the Mediterranean Commission which started in 1996, focused primarily on the western part of the Mediterranean. By addressing in this 12th conference the eastern part of the Mediterranean, the key role of Turkey in Mediterranean affairs is acknowledged. Since the aim of ELEC is to support a greater and deeper European Union, it also wants to improve the relations with Turkey. Gasòliba thanked the co-organisers of the conference, as well as the co-sponsor, the Obra Social of the La Caixa Foundation.

President Ayhan Zeytinoglu of IKV explained that his organisation, that celebrated its 50th anniversary in 2015, is specialised in EU and Turkey-EU matters. Turkey realised an annual economic growth rate of 4.7% in the period 2002-2014, thanks to the tentative EU membership perspective that was an anchor for reforms. Turkey is now the 18th economy in the world and member of the G-20, and has made considerable progress in tackling its macro-economic imbalances. Hopefully the refugee crisis will speed up the accession proceedings with the EU.

Hansjörg Haber, the head of the European Union delegation in Turkey, pointed out that Turkey and Istanbul have always been a hub in a wide variety of fields, ranging from culture to the topics that are discussed at this conference: energy, finance, infrastructure and production. In energy, Turkey has an enviable position since it is a bridge between the consumer countries in the west and the oil and gas producing countries in the east, although it lacks physical connections and an integrated market. In finance Istanbul has an outstanding potential. Much will depend on the stability of the legal and fiscal environment. Infrastructure has been considerably upgraded, also thanks to substantial grants by the EU, but much remains to be done in education and training. Finally, Turkey is also a favourable hub for production, in sectors such as automotive, pharma and services.

Rauf Engin Soysal, Turkish undersecretary for EU affairs, reminded that we live in critical times, facing immense challenges. Turkish-EU closeness matters more than ever, as was demonstrated during the November 2015 summit between Turkey and the EU. We are all Mediterraneans. It is time to act in favour of full EU accessibility. On the question whether Turkey is a European and regional hub, Soysal claimed that Turkey is already in the very heart of Europe. But the bar should be set higher. Turkey has already a privileged position in the EU and NATO and the same should be pursued in the whole surrounding region. The immigration crisis is now the top priority and the EU and Turkey have to respond together. Turkey has proved it is up to the challenge. With its economic growth of more than 4%, Turkey is already number four on the world raking. Every day the country raises the bar on fundamental rights and freedoms. It wants to capture the momentum of European and global values. Turkey is not a country of barbarism and terrorism, but a big laboratory in combining traditionalism with modernism. If Europe puts the focus on the Mediterranean, it would in fact return to its own foundations.

Energy hub

The first session of the conference on Turkey as a European and regional hub was devoted to the energy sector. Sohbet Karbuz from the Obserservatoire Méditerranéen de l’Energie in Paris that gathers energy companies that operate in the Mediterranean, first wondered what “a hub” means. The term refers to a corridor, a transit, but a good hub should also be a trading platform. In gas, Turkey still has a long way to go, but the potential is there. Karbuz referred to the Turkish Stream plans and the many challenges in the gas market (Russia, storage, legal framework). A domestic production would be a plus. One should also keep in mind that global gas markets are changing (LNG, shale oil, prices). At the same time, Turkey should make efforts to act as an oil hub. The name “hub” or “transit” is not important, what is needed is a 20 or 30 year strategic plan.

Ridvan Ucar, general manager of Aygas Natural Gas Wholesale Trade, agreed with the analysis of the former speaker. One should look at the map and see where the best location for a hub is. Turkey is situated in-between consumers and producers, but it is more than only a pipe line. Making a transit hub into a trading hub demands efforts. Turkey should not miss the boat to become a trading hub and should not be afraid to make mistakes while doing so. This requires liberalisation, which is a long term process. For the EU, Turkey can offer supply security.

Olgu Okumus, project manager of the energy division of the Union for the Mediterranean, said her organisation tries to enhance cooperation with the Mediterranean through concrete projects. By way of energy platforms, it provides a permanent forum, e.g. gas, regional electricity markets and renewable energy. In electricity transmission, Turkey links the eastern part of the Mediterranean.

Financial hub

During the second session, Turkey’s role as a financial hub was discussed. According to Fabian Briegel, economist at Rabobank (Netherlands), Turkey’s potential as a financial centre is considerable but it will take time to achieve this goal. Among the many favourable factors, the fact that Turkey is an EU accession candidate is of upmost importance. In international rankings Istanbul is not so far behind Paris or Amsterdam. The Turkish capital market is dominated by banks, while financing through stocks and bonds plays a minor role. One of the weaknesses is the dependence on foreign funding because Turkey struggles with its current account deficit, which in turn results in exchange rate volatility and high inflation. This contrasts with countries such as the UAE and Saudi-Arabia that can rely on local financial savings. So macro-economic reforms should be continued, while micro-economic policy should enhance public stock listings, corporate governance and information to foreign investors.

Rankings may act as an incentive for politicians, but according to Alvaro Oritz, economist at BBVA Bank (Spain), the problem is that there are no safe havens in emerging markets. Turkey has a Chinese growth rate of 4% but is surrounded by countries such as the Ukraine, Syria, Iraq and Greece. Among the positive factors, he mentioned the reduction of the current account deficit from 10% to 4%, the absence of an ageing population, the potential for corporate profit growth, the excellent infrastructure and a good image. The accession process to the EU is – just like it was in Spain – a positive thing because it makes reforms necessary, be it that the political crisis in the EU makes it more difficult than before. Turkey should make efforts to improve its comparative advantages, but Oritz recommended to select priorities rather than aiming for all components of the ranking. Turkey should not forget either that Hong Kong and Singapore were trading centres before they developed into a financial centre.

Yavuz Canevi, chairman of the Turkish Economy Bank and former governor of the Turkish Central Bank, referred to the action plans that were launched to make Istanbul an international financial centre. They are now for 80% completed, but challenges remain ahead. The most important is that after a sleeping period Turkey is now re-emerging as a candidate EU country. This horizon should be finally cleared. Other challenges are the normalisation and democratisation process, private lead growth and reducing inflation. It is also essential that the new administration structure that needs to be set up for the international financial centre of Istanbul, should not be run by the government. At the same time, Istanbul should look for specific financial niches such as Islamic finance or a regional centre for multinationals’ administration. After the banking crisis, Istanbul already improved its relative performance. There is a window of opportunity. By 2050 the Turkish economy will be the 9th economy in the world (versus 16th now) and the third in Europe (versus 6th now). The contribution to GDP of a financial centre could be as high as 8%.

The debate after the financial hub session treated topics such as Turkish migration to the EU, Syrian refugees in Turkey, challenges of turning developing countries into developed countries and access to Far East savings and investments.

Infrastructure hub

The third session analysed Turkey as an infrastructure, communications and logistics hub. Yigit Alpogan, deputy secretary general of the Union for the Mediterranean, explained that his organisation brings together the 28 EU member states and 15 countries from the southern and eastern shores of the Mediterranean. It was launched in 2008 by then French president Sarkozy as an alternative to Turkey’s admission to the EU. The UfM strictly focuses on projects, and does not interfere with the peace process in the region. Syria’s membership, for example, is suspended until peace comes back to the country. But through political engineered solutions, the UfM brokers delicate projects such as the desalinisation project in Gaza, the trans-Maghreb highway, and projects between Morocco and Algeria. In infrastructure, the UfM would like to expand the trans-Maghreb highway around the whole Mediterranean Sea. It promotes linking the north and south of the Mediterranean by the “Motorway of the Sea” initiative.

Evren Bingöl of the International Transporters’ Association indicated that the improved quality of Turkish infrastructure made Turkey climb in the logistic sector index of the World Bank from the 39th place in 2007 to the 30th place in 2014, on a total of 160 countries, and this despite a setback in timeliness and price competitiveness. She focussed specifically on road transit, which handicaps greatly the customs union between Turkey and the EU. A Turkish truck that transports goods to, for example, Germany, is submitted to successive quota when it wants to drive through countries such as Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary and Austria. Permits are needed to cross each country and are only supplied in restricted quantities. Italy for its part distributes a limited quantity of permits every two months, resulting in a cyclic slowdown of trade. All this involves a huge cost – estimated at 3.4 billion

euro – aggravated by a very complex system of limited visas for truck drivers. The restrictions are only applied to transport coming from Turkey. This is even more absurd since half of Turkey-EU exports originates from Turkish affiliates of EU capital companies. Mrs. Bingöl fiercely pleaded to at least liberalise transit transport. A first step could be that the 28 EU member states provide global and not country by country quotas. Overall, Turkeys strategic objective is to become not only a transport hub but a regional logistic hub, that reaches out not only to the EU but that goes as far as China and the Caspian Sea.

An animated discussion followed not only on road transit restrictions, but also on connections to the Black Sea, the possible role of river transport on the Danube, the position of Cyprus and the Syrian refugee problem.

Production hub

The fourth and final session was devoted to Turkey as a production and service hub. Antonio Martins da Cruz, president of ELEC Portugal and former Portuguese minister of foreign affairs, emphasised that political will or a good strategic position are not enough to become a hub. A market is needed. Turkey is set to become a regional power. It has many strategic assets but can also be a strategical threat in regional disputes. Until recently, Turkey had no problems with its neighbours, but the Arab spring changed all that. It is difficult to act as a safe corridor amid regional and political tensions. Several obstacles undermine Turkish ambitions. Syria, Iraq and Isis, but also Kurdish separatism, could create uncertainty that can spill over to investments and tourism. The re-emergence of Iran, the Russian intervention in Syria and the Chinese plans to build a new silk road also pose challenges. Africa on the contrary is an opportunity that could make Turkey a hub for this region. For the EU, cooperation with Turkey is essential to ease the refugee burden, even if the EU is divided on this topic. At the same time, the EU integration process has changed. The EU could be growing into a multispeed club with different circles (euro, Schengen, defence, integration) around a common platform and with more power for national governments. Martins da Cruz, finally, warned that if Turkey joins the EU, it will still be a peripheral country in the EU, which does not make things easier.

According to Bozkurt Aran, director of the TEPAV Centre for Multilateral Trade Studies, nowadays it is globalisation that determines the rapid economic growth of Turkey. Liberalisation, the customs union with the EU, the growing role of SME’s, the development of the financial system and an export lead growth, all have favoured investments. Turkey is now the largest industrial production hub between Italy and China. It is not yet a trading nation, but it plays a leading role in the region. The EU and MENA (Middle East and North Africa) account for 70% of Turkish trade. Given their specific geographical connections, the western part of Turkey is more directed towards the EU, the eastern part towards MENA. Two projects will be of major influence in the future: the new silk road that China wants to build and the TTIP trade agreements that will allow Turkey to deepen its custom union.

Haluk Nuray, the IKV representative at the EU in Brussels, fears that the EU customs union, that was the most important factor in the sevenfold increase of Turkish exports towards the EU since the eighties, is now halted. To get things moving again, more is needed than liberalisation. Turkey should produce unique products, at a good price and with facilitated transport. In equipment and skills, Turkey should raise the bar higher than just middleclass. To convince other partners, Turkey needs more innovation to attract technology transfers. Turkey is already part of the European production chain, but should also become part of the global value chain. Being involved in the EU and TTIP are solid references for Turkey. Since accessibility to the EU is key, achieving stability and respecting the fundamental freedoms are a necessity.

In the debate with the audience, the question whether the end of Iran’s isolation is an opportunity or a threat for Turkey was widely discussed, as well as the consequences of the migration and refugee flow.

In his concluding remarks, ELEC Mediterranean Commission president Carles Gasòliba said that Turkey is indeed a European and regional hub, but there remains still a lot of work to be done in the current difficult times. The recent EU-Turkish summit showed a will to improve relations and could be a turning point in the integration process. IKV chairman Ayhan Zeytinoglu thanked speakers and participants and confirmed that IKV does everything it can to realise the Turkish association to the EU.

 

Avrupa Birliği Dernekleri Federasyonu 9 Mayıs 2014’te Kurulmuştu.

By Katılımcı Demokrasi ve Sivil Toplum Diyaloğu

Ülkemizin gelişme ve çağdaşlaşma yolunda önemli bir etap olan Avrupa Birliğine katılım yönündeki çalışmaların etkin bir şekilde devamı çok önemlidir. Ekim 2004 tarihli, müzakerelerin başlayabileceğini belirten Tavsiye Metninde üye devletler ve Türkiye arasında algılamaların değerlendirilerek geliştirilmesi önerilmiş ve bu diyalogda sivil toplumun önemli bir rol üstlenmesi gerektiği vurgulanmıştır.

Ülkemizin Avrupa Birliğine katılımını desteklemek üzere faaliyette bulunan derneklerin etkinliğini artırmak, güçbirliği ve dayanışma içerisinde bulunarak yeni bir sinerji yaratmak üzere Avrupa Birliği Dernekleri Federasyonu 9 Mayıs 2014 tarihinde kurulmuştur.

Federasyonun amaçları aşağıda özetlenmiştir;

Avrupa Birliğine üyeliğin ekonomik, sosyal, kültürel, toplumsal, sektörel ve bölgesel sonuçlarına ve entegrasyon sürecinde yapılması gerekecek değişikliklere ilişkin araştırma, değerlendirme ve bilgilendirme çalışmaları yürütmek, katılım müzakereleri sürecindeki çalışmalara katkıda bulunmak, gerçek ve tüzel kişiler, sivil toplum kuruluşları ile ilgili konularda yurtiçinde ve Türkiye ile Avrupa Birliği ve üye ülkeler arasında diyalogun geliştirilmesi çalışmaları yapmak, yapılan çalışmalara katılmak, koordinasyon sağlamak,

-Türkiye’nin üyeliği yolunda yurtiçinde ve yurtdışında gerekli tanıtım, bilgilendirme çalışmaları yapmak, aynı amaçla yurtiçi ve dışında üyelerimizin faaliyetlerinin koordinasyonunu ve yönlendirilmesini sağlamak,

-Entegrasyon sürecine sivil katılımın sağlanması perspektifiyle ilgili mevzuata uygun olarak yurtiçinde ve yurtdışında sivil toplum kuruluşları kamu ve özel sektör, kurum ve kuruluşlar üye ve aday ülkeler temsilcilikleri ile işbirliği ve güç birliğinin sağlanması için platformlar ve gerekli yeni kuruluşlar oluşturulmasını sağlamak, Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği gençliği için müşterek ortam hazırlamak

AB çalışmalarında bu sinerjiyi yaratmak ve işbirliğini sağlamak üzere kurulan federasyonun üyeleri

-Avrupa Birliği Çalışmaları Merkezi Derneği, Ankara

-İstanbul Avrupa Birliği Öncüleri Derneği

-Konya Avrupa Birliği Çalışmaları Merkezi Derneği

-İstanbul Beyoğlu Avrupa Birliği Derneği

-Çukurova Avrupa Birliği Çalışmaları Merkezi Derneği’dir.

Pascal Lamy Sanayi Odasının Davetlisi Olarak İstanbul’a TTIP Hakkında Konuşmak için Geldi.

By Haberler

Dünya Ticaret Örgütü’nün eski başkanı ve Jacques Delors Enstitü’sünün emeritüs başkanı Pascal Lamy, İstanbul Sanayi Odasının 13 Şubat 2016 ‘da düzenlediği toplantının ana konuşmacısıydı.

Lamy konuşmasına ticareti engelleyen uygulamaları açıklamakla başladı . Ticarete konu olan malların karşı karşıya kaldıkları  maliyetin  % 5 inin gümrük tarifelerinden (ortalama gümrük oranları göz önünde tutulduğunda) , %10 ‘unun sınırları geçerken karşılaşılan maliyetlerden ,- %20 sinin ise çeşitli standardlara ve uygulanan ticareti düzenleyici kurallara uyum zorluğundan kaynaklandığını ifade etti. Ticaretin geliştirilmesi için yürütülen çalışmaların bu standalara, kurallara uyum konularınna yönelmeleri gerektiğini belirttikten sonra bugünün yeni ticaret dünyasında nelerin amaçlandığına geçti.

Transatlantik Ticaret ve Yatırım Ortaklığı’nın (TTIP’nin) bilinen geleneksel ticaret ve yatırım anlaşmalarından çok farklı, çok daha kapsamlı,  çok daha boyutlu olduğunu ifade etti. Avrupa Birliği’nin (AB’nin) mallarının %80’ inini, hizmetlerinin %20 sini liberalleştirilmesini ancak 30 yılda gerçekleştirebildiğini hatırlarsak, .TTIP’nin hedeflerine ulaşılmasının  zaman alacağını kaçınılmazlığı üzerinde durdu.

Bu yeni ticaret dünyasının düzenini artık korumacı olarak nitelendirilemeyeceğini, “korumacılığın” yerini “önlemciliğe” bıraktığını ifade etti. Eski ticaret dünyasında uygulanan ticaret politikaları üreticileri korumaya yönelik iken, bugünün yeni düzeninde hedef tüketicileri korumaktır. Tüketici sağlığını, güvenliğini, işçilerin haklarını, hayvanların korunmasını ve çevrenin korunmasını hedef alan yeni standard ve kurallar geliştirilmiştir. Bugün tüketilen gıda mallarının, ürünlerin içindeki maksimum pesitsit kalıntıları gibi standardların değiştirilmesi mümkün değildir ve bu kurallara uyan herkes gelişmiş pazarlara ve bu standartları uygulayan diğer ülkelere ürünlerini satabilecektir.

Lamy TTIP ile ilgili müzakerelerin  %80 inin  tüketiciyi koruma standartlarının uyumlu kılmasıyla ilgili olduğunu ve geri kalan %20 sinin ise geleneksel ticaretin konusuna giren gümrük tarifeleri ve pazara giriş şartları ve yolları ile ilgili olduğunu söyledi. TTIP ile  bir gerçek transatlantik tek pazar kurulduğunda, bu pazar dünya gayrı safi hasılasının %40 ını ve dünya ticaretinin ve yatırımlarının büyük bir bölümünü kapasayacaktır.

Lamy, gidilecek yolun zor olduğunu belirtmeyi ihmal etmemiştir. Siyasi liderlerin TTIP’yi yeterli biçimde açıklamamış olmaları, görüşmelerin yeterince şeffaf olmaması, TTIP karşıtı hareketlerin gelişmesine yol açmıştır. Bu iddialı planın 850 milyon tüketiciyi kapsayacağını ve dünyanın en büyük serbest ticaret bölgesini oluşturacağının liderlerce iyice açıklanması gerektiğini vurguladı. Bazı konuların cözümünde zorluk çekilmesinin altında ABD ve AB liler arasında kültürel farklılıklardan kaynaklandığını ve neticede bu anlaşmanın 2019 baharında önce sonuçlanamayabileceğini ifade etti.

 

Sahil Güvenlik Güçlerimizin Ege Denizinde bir Suriyeli Göçmeni Helikopterle kurtarırken çekilmiş bir video

By Haberler

2016 nın başından itibaren Akdeniz’de 409 kişinin hayatını kaybetmişlerdir. AB ülkelerine gidebilmek ve orada güven altında yaşamak için herşeyi göze alan bu mültecilerin durumu çok zor. Türkiye’de kalanların bir kısmı kamplarda, bir kısmı büyük şehirlere akın etmiş durumda. Istanbul’un Laleli ve Fatih semtenlerinde 300.000 e yakın Suriye’nin yerleşmiş olduğu ve bugüne kadar Arapça konuşulan 18 lokanta açtıkları söyleniyor.Şehirlerin ve Türkiye’nin bütününün nüfus yapısı değişiyor.

https://www.ultimedia.com/deliver/generic/iframe/mdtk/01435628/zone/1/src/lsz0kk/autoplay/yes/xtn2/1/xtpage/Videos::Videos::Des_Garde_Cotes_Turques_Sauvent_Par_Helicoptere_Un_Migrant_Desespere_Dans_La_Mer_Egee/#

Hayaller ve Gerçeklerle Yüzyüze.

By AB Genişleme Politikası

Sitemiz açılmadan önce verilmiş bir sözü yerine getirmem gerektiğinde bu blogu Turkish Policy Quarterly (TPQ)  için yazmiştım. Kendilerine atıfta bulunmam şartıyla kendi sitemizde yayınlanması konusunda anlaştık. Yazım kendi sitelerinde aşağıdaki bağlantıdan ulaşılabilir: http://turkishpolicy.com/blog/11/face-to-face-with-illusions-and-realities#.Vryw-uKB5NM.mailto

Yazının kendisi ise aşağıdaki gibidir.

On the occasion of the International Peace Congress organized in Paris in 1849, in his speech entitled “A Day Will Come,” Victor Hugo had spoken of a period when Europe would be known as the “United States of Europe” and where in his words:

“You France, you Russia, you Italy, you England, you Germany, you all, nations of the continent, without losing your distinct qualities and your glorious individuality, will be merged closely within a superior unit and you will form the European brotherhood”.

A European Union exists to-day but without Russia.

John Maynard Keynes in 1930 in his Essays in Persuasions wrote an article called “Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren” where he tried to answer the following question: “What can we reasonably expect the level of our economic life to be a hundred years hence? What are the economic possibilities for our grandchildren?” His answer was as follows:

“The pace at which we can reach our destination of economic bliss will be governed by four things; our power to control population, our determination to avoid wars and civil dissensions, our willingness to entrust to science the direction of those matters which are properly the concern of science, and the rate of accumulation as fixed by the margin between our production and our consumption; of which the last will easily look after itself, given the first three.”

Today, we are far from being able to make similar projections for our world or the EU. We can no longer speak of a unifying Europe at a time when we speak of a Brexit and Grexit, or of an EU with no problems when it is still living the economic side effects of the 2008 crisis which started hitting them hard in 2009. The recovery is still slow and the Eurozone still prone to ups and downs. To the existing economic crisis, new social and political problems have been added. The influx of refugees from Iraq, Syria and elsewhere, the specter of the rise of extreme right parties and fascism within the EU forces us to contemplate a somewhat dark future for Europe.

Things do not look too bright for Turkey either. The economy is slowing down, many cities and regions of Turkey are living the aftershocks of having close to three million Syrian refugees living in the country, looking for jobs, living quarters, and schools while the widening conflict in Turkey’s southeast between government forces and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) continues causing domestic and regional uncertainties.

These multifarious problems have led Turkey and the EU to revitalize their up till now frozen relations. The EU that had always emphasized its concerns on human rights, civil liberties, and democracy in Turkey seems now to have replaced the priority it had given to these fundamental values with new concerns about regional security, rising terrorism in the West, and the increase in the flow of refugees. This duplicity in the way relations between Turkey and the EU is conducted is saddening but a reality

The Turkey-EU Summit meeting of November 29, 2015 and the meetings that followed the summit allowed for the opening of a new Chapter  ­– Chapter 17 – in the accession negotiations, the starting of discussions over visa free travel for Turkish citizens by the end of the current year, the upgrading of the Customs Union Agreement, and the initiation of multiple talks on energy cooperation. This revitalization of relations was coolly welcomed by pro-EU constituencies in Turkey. One has only become too used to the “one step forward two steps back” policies of both the EU and Turkey.

Chapter 17 on Economic and Monetary Policy which was opened to negotiation during the Intergovernmental Conference last December had been formerly blocked by France’s former President Nicolas Sarkozy. It is the 15th chapter to have been opened out of a total of 35. In my opinion, Turkey will face no trouble in aligning itself to the directives of Chapter 17. Its level of alignment to the Maastricht Criteria is somewhat satisfactory especially with regard to the levels of budgetary deficit and public debt. But inflation, total independence of the central bank and aligning Turkey’s laws with the EU’s Economic and Monetary Policy legislation are areas in which further progress is needed.

The visa issue is a complex one. It is stated that by October 2016, Turkish citizens will be able to travel to the EU without a visa. However, 72 criteria have to be met by Turkey during this visa liberalization roadmap, including the recognition of Cyprus which currently Turkey does not recognize. This political issue will have to be resolved before visa exemption for Turkish citizens can become a reality. Visa-free travel is also contingent on Turkey implementing the EU-Turkey readmission agreement, which would result in third country citizens illegally entering Europe via Turkey forced to return  to Turkey. The agreement is an ambiguous one since all illegal entrants from Turkey, independent of the time they might have moved to an EU country, could be sent back. There seems to be no time limit and one expert jokingly pointed out that even those illegal immigrants who had entered Europe in the 1940’s could end up being sent back.

Upgrading the Customs Union agreement (CU)[1] by modernizing its functioning and extending it to new areas and Turkey’s inclusion in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)[2] are two important topics on Turkey’s agenda. It has been argued for quite sometime that the present CU agreement was in need of revision. When examining the many possibilities concerning what kind of changes might be involved, five potential scenarios come to light:

1. Not changing the agreement thus letting the current and worsening implementation deficit and non-compliance record stand

2. Modernizing the agreement by making amendments without changing its sectorial scope, that is letting it deal only with industrial products

3. Taking the agreement as a base and revising it with a view to facilitating its functioning and expanding it to cover new areas

4. Working out a totally new CU agreement

5. Replacing the CU with a Free Trade Agreement

My preference would be Scenario 3 since it would necessitate less time to agree on revisions than rewriting a totally new CU agreement.

Since Turkey is not a member of the EU, Turkey’s inclusion in the TTIP faces serious obstacles. There is a slight chance that when a final agreement on TTIP is reached, Turkey might be integrated into the agreement since it is already a candidate country that has already signed a Customs Union Agreement with the EU. If this does not happen, then the solution might reside in Turkey’s signing a separate Free Trade Agreement with the US. Right now the EU-US trade talks are still continuing and a final agreement does not appear to be within reach. The 12th round of talks will take place in Brussels from February 22 to February 26 2016. We should be ready for a succession of rounds in the future.

Coming back to where we stand today in Turkey’s relations with the EU, the main item on the agenda for the EU seems to be to secure its borders with the help of Turkey in return for which it will extend financial aid to Turkey for hosting refugees while leaving the door slightly open for future accession. Wondering  whether we shall ever squeeze in…


[1] http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/roadmaps/docs/2015_trade_035_turkey_en.pdf

[2] Kemal Kirişci “Turkey and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Boosting the Model Partnership with the United States” The Center on the United States and Europe (CUSE) at Brookings, Policy paper Number 2, September 2013

 

11 Şubat’ta Avrupa Parlementosunun Bütçe ve Sivil Hürriyetler Komiteleri Üyeleri Türkiye’ye geliyor

By Haberler

Bütçe komitesi üyeleri ilgili resmi mercilerle üyelik öncesinde tahsis edilen fonların kullanımı,Suriye ve Irak’tan gelen mültecilere tahsis edilen AB kaynaklarının kullanımı hakkında görüşmeler yapacak ve mülteci kamplarından birini gezecekler. Sivil hak ve hürriyetler komitesi üyeleri ise bu kampları gezecek, mülteci ve göçmenlere yardım konusunu yetkili kişiler, uluslararası sivil toplum örgütleri ve diğer ortak kuruluşlarla yerinde inceleyeceklerdir.

Nato ve Suriye Göçmen Krizi

By Haberler

Bu pazartesi Davutoğlu ve Merkel Ankara’da bir araya gelerek Nato’nun Ege denizinde nöbet tutarak Rusya’nın ve Suriye hükümetinin Halep’e hucum etmeleriyle yoğunluk kazanan Suriyeli göçmen krizini hafifletmesi konusunda anlaştılar. Avrupa Komisyonu salı günü bu ikili görüşme sırasında varılan görüş birliğine destek verdi. Nato üyesi ülkelerin savunma bakanlarının dünkü ve bugünkü toplantısında hernekadar  gündemde Rusya, doğu Avrupa ve savunma harcamaları bulunuyor ise de bu konu da ele alındı. Nato genel sekreteri ve ABD’nin Nato’daki büyükelçisi Douglas Lute bu yardıma olumlu bakmakla beraber tüm sorumluluğun Avrupa Komisyonu tarafında üstlenmesi gerektiğine vurgu yaptılar.

AB’ nin Kurucu Üyeleri İkili Bir Yapıya sahip bir Avrupa olabileceğini belirttiler

By Haberler

Bu salı akşamı AB’nin altı kurucu üyesi (Almanya, Belçika, Fransa, Hollanda, İtalya ve Lüksemburg) ortak bir bildiriyle birbirine sıkı sıkıya bağlı bir Avrupayı hedeflerken aynı zamanda bir ilke imza atarak bu Avrupa’nın ikili bir yapıya, entegrasyonun iki ayrı hızda gerçekleşebileceğini duyurdular. Ingiltere başbakanı David Cameron’un İngiltere’nin birbirine daha sıkı bağlı bir Avrupa politikasının dışında tutulmasını istediği bir dönemde bu ortak bildiriyle farklı hızda bir entegrasyonun mümkün olduğunu kabul edilmiş  oldu.